React Native vs Flutter vs Xamarin: What to choose in 2020? February 3, 2020 | Blog, Mobile App

Technology is changing very rapidly nowadays and the businesses need to adapt to the changes and choose the best option that suits their organization. If the records are to be believed then there are over 5 billion smartphone users all over the world and these numbers will grow up to 7 billion till the year 2021. The statistics from around the world have shown that around 85 pct. of the smartphone users have an android operating system and only 15 pct. have iOS.

The smartphone users use 57 pct. of their phones for applications. These records show how important it is for businesses to have an application that can connect them with their customers and clients.

The main question that comes up is, which technology is the best for building an application for the organizations? Which platform or operating system should the organizations choose? Is native application development the right choice for the organization or they should opt for cross-platform application development? What is the cost of developing applications on different platforms?

The answers to most of these questions will be answered in this article.

Which Platform to Choose? 

For the organization that is looking for developing an application for both android and iOS, a cross-platform application development framework is the best option as it is cost-efficient and saves time.

Developing an application on a cross-platform framework is the best option for the organizations as of now as it reduces the cost of application development by half. The time taken for developing the application i.e. the life cycle of the development of the application also reduces to a greater extent as code has to be written only once for all the platforms. Almost 97 % of the code is sharable for all the platforms.

The top frameworks for developing cross-platforms are React Native, Xamarin and Flutter. Below is a comparison that will let the organization understand which one of these three is most suitable for them.

React Native vs Xamarin vs Flutter

Below are the points that will show the differences between the three platforms and make it clear for the organizations which application is most suitable for them.


If we believe in google trends, Xamarin has got ahead of React Native. The community of developers is moving towards Xamarin. Compared to React Native and Flutter too, more and more organizations and even some best mobile application development companies are choosing Xamarin. There is a new framework for cross-platform application development every 3 months nowadays as cross-platform development is in trend, and it saves a lot of money and time for the organizations. Because of the launch of a new framework in such a short time, the ranking of the frameworks keeps fluctuating, but still the ranking of Xamarin and React Native stays the same.

Performance Analytics:

If the organizations want a platform that offers great performance, then they should go for Flutter, it is better than both Xamarin and React Native. It ranks on the top in the list of cross-platform app development in terms of performance, after it the second framework that has great performance is React Native. The reason why Flutter offers the best performance is the Dart code, the Dart code can be compiled with native machine code, this removes the bridge of JavaScript. The reason why React Native comes after Flutter is that it is dependent on JavaScript and because of that there is an issue for rendering the datasets that are large. If Xamarin is considered, then it’s performance can be compared to the native mobile applications.

Framework Diameter:

The size of Flutter’s application is the largest among the three of them, because of this reason the developers are frustrated sometimes. For a clear version, the core engine of flutter takes up to 2.7 MB of the space plus the code space, this makes it a bit large in the diameter. In the case of React Native, the code of the mobile application is differentiated to many blocks that make the proceeding easy. Xamarin takes the use of architecture MVC and MVVM that helps it to accelerate the process of an application that too with less diameter. So the organizations can choose one of the three suits them, according to the size of their application.

Support from the community:

For pointing out the errors in the framework and for offering support for the same, the community support is important. In all three frameworks, Xamarin provides the least community support. Both Flutter and React Native provide great community support to its users better support. If GitHub is to be believed, React Native has the largest number of followers for community support. Because of the largest number of followers, the best among the three frameworks is to React Native. 

Conclusion: What to choose?

The comparisons covered most of the aspects that the organizations look at before choosing a framework for the purpose of website development, even the best mobile app development company in the world will also look at all the factors before choosing a framework. Flutter offers the organizations the fastest development, so if they want a framework through which the applications can be developed in a short time, it is the one. On the other hand, React Native is very popular, it is simple to use and also provides good customer support. The main factor that affects the choice of the organizations for the framework for developing a cross-platform application is their requirement. The organizations need to see which one of these three can fulfill all their requirements. The best mobile app developers will also advise the organizations to be clear about their requirements so that the best framework can be chosen. The trend keeps on changing so the organizations also have to look out for the latest updates released by these frameworks, and also on the new frameworks. Be it Flutter, Xamarin or React Native, all of them have some qualities and some loopholes, not even one of them is perfect in all the aspects.